AI diligence infrastructure
Kaptrix provides evidence-backed AI diligence using deterministic scoring, artifact-based analysis, and traceable reporting.
Built for
Private equity
Substance-focused diligence on AI-heavy platforms and add-ons.
Growth equity
Technical qualification across an AI investment pipeline.
Corporate development
Acquisition-grade evaluation of AI capabilities and exposure.
Technical diligence teams
Structured evidence and risk artifacts for operator-led reviews.
Methodology
Kaptrix applies a deterministic, versioned framework for evaluating AI systems beyond demos and narratives. Every score is tied to specific artifacts. Every conclusion is traceable to source documents. Unsupported claims surface as explicit diligence gaps.
Confidence is a function of evidence coverage, not model certainty.
The framework was developed through repeated internal AI evaluation workflows prior to productization. Practitioner identities remain confidential during qualified engagements. A detailed methodology overview, scoring structure, and calibration approach are available for qualified review.
Methodology v1.0 — overview of scoring logic, calibration approach, trigger conditions, and audit structure. Available for qualified review.
Six weighted dimensions
How Kaptrix works
Upload
Upload technical, commercial, governance, and operational artifacts.
Score
Evidence is mapped against six weighted diligence dimensions.
Trigger
Low-confidence areas, unsupported claims, and concentrated risks are surfaced for review.
Read
Generate institutional-grade reports, audit trails, and remediation plans.
Outputs
Scoring is deterministic and human-calibrated. Every conclusion maintains a traceable evidence lineage from source artifact to committee-ready output.
What you receive
Master AI Diligence Report
Composite scoring across six dimensions with evidence-linked findings, red flags, and dimension-level conclusions.
A single defensible record of what the evidence supports and what remains unproven.
Technical Risk Register
Ranked technical, vendor, data, and governance risks with affected area, likelihood, and remediation.
Quantifies post-close exposure before capital is committed.
Confidence Coverage Report
Per-finding evidence coverage and confidence tier with the artifacts each conclusion is anchored to.
Separates score from certainty so committee discussion targets real diligence gaps.
IC Memo
One-page committee memo with composite score, conviction statement, top risks, and recommended next steps.
Aligns the deal team and committee on the same evidence record.
100-Day Action Plan
Prioritized 30/60/90-day remediation tied to specific risks and dimensions with owners and dependencies.
Converts findings into the operating plan for the first hundred days post-close.
Before you write the memo.